Skip to content

Obama – Benghazi SCANDAL deepens – a second DOD drone was watching

This scandal is just getting deeper – now it’s confirmed a DOD drone watched the breach of the gate and setting fire to the compound. Of course we know NOTHING was done about it.

But, the press and Obama lies corps have tried again to insulate his incompetence and disregard for America by claiming the feed was never sent to the White House. What???????  An attack on the sovereign territory of the USA on 9-11, no less – not sent to the White House?

I copied the whole article below bec ause I believe it might be one they scrub off the net.

Live video from a drone flying over the U.S. Consulate during the Sept. 11 terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, was monitored at a Defense Department facility, but was not fed to the White House, senior officials say.

The Obama administration has declined to respond to media requests for details about who was watching the live video, but a senior defense official told The Washington Times that “the surveillance aircraft captured footage of events on the ground” and “it wasn’t available that night at the White House.”

The officials said the “overhead footage was available at a DOD location,” and they declined to comment further.

Questions about the drone video have largely gotten lost amid the raucous political theater that has arisen in the aftermath of the Benghazi attack, in which U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens, former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, and State Department officer Sean Smith were slain.

Some close observers of the Benghazi attack’s aftermath are hoping that details about the video will emerge when the findings of the State Department’s Accountability Review Board investigation into the attacks are eventually made public.

The review board has conducted its work in secrecy, and its findings and recommendations are expected to draw heavily from classified intelligence about the attack.

On Friday, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, Florida Republican and chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, announced that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton would testify publicly about the findings, but gave no date for her appearance.

The State Department this week suggested that the review board findings may be imminent. Spokeswoman Victoria Nuland told reporters Monday that when Mrs. Clinton announced the board’s members in late September, she “asked them to try to meet a 60- to 65-day timeline.”

That would mean the findings could be released during the coming days. “I don’t have any reason to think that we’re off base there, but obviously we want them to do it, do it right,” Mrs. Nuland said.

Various video footage

The digital camera aboard what defense officials have described as an “unarmed surveillance” drone, meanwhile, was one of several that recorded portions of the Benghazi attack.

Closed-circuit security cameras fixed to the consulate’s outer security walls also captured images.

A senior State Department official said during an Oct. 9 background briefing that one camera “on the main gate” of the Benghazi diplomatic mission showed “a large number of men, armed men, flowing into the compound” at about 9:40 p.m. on Sept. 11 — the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the U.S.

Footage from that camera is thought to be what Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper, the Obama administration’s top intelligence official, has shown to lawmakers on Capitol Hill during two recent classified briefings about the Benghazi attack.

“It was very difficult to watch,” Rep. Thomas J. Rooney, Florida Republican and a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said Dec. 5 after one of the briefings. “That is U.S. sovereign territory, and for people to just walk in like a street mob and light the embassy on fire it just made you feel extremely helpless.”

It is unclear whether footage from the surveillance drone has been included in Mr. Clapper’s briefings.

Defense Department officials have said the drone did not arrive over the Benghazi compound until about two hours after the militants stormed through the facility’s gates.

Critical observers, including one family member of the men who were killed, have questioned whether officials monitoring the drone video missed a chance to launch a more aggressive rescue mission or a counterstrike on the militants.

Response in real time

Senior defense officials argued otherwise during a Nov. 9 background briefing on the Benghazi attack.

“There are people out there who have suggested that an overhead surveillance aircraft could have perfect visibility into what was happening on the ground, and on that basis alone, you could send in a team,” one senior defense official said. “That is not necessarily how things work.

“You get a lot of good information from a surveillance aircraft, but it doesn’t necessarily provide you a complete and instant picture of what is happening on the ground. If you’re going to undertake military action, you’d better have solid information before you decide to take the kinds of steps that are required to effectively complete a military mission of this sort.”

A senior U.S. intelligence official, meanwhile, has told The Times that the CIA’s personnel in Benghazi “responded to the situation on the night of 11 and 12 September as quickly and as effectively as possible.”

“The security officers in particular were genuine heroes,” said the official, noting that CIA personnel drove to the site of the attack within 25 minutes of the alarm first being raised and “put their own lives on the line to save their comrades.”

The official said a support team was scrambled from the Libyan capital of Tripoli and, despite having to put together a team from scratch and charter a plane to fly them to Benghazi, were able to make the trip in less than four hours.

Officials have declined to comment on whether anyone in Benghazi or Tripoli had access to the drone footage in real time, or whether it was used to help the rescue team find its way into the city from the Benghazi airport.

Shaun Waterman contributed to this rep
Read more:
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter



Here is how Obama smothers the economic recovery we need

It’s so easy to see if only we look at the governments own released data.

They have to believe the vast majority of Americans are really very, very stupid.

Just think about this…..

For October and November, 2012 (latest data) we see FEDERAL INCOME (that’s all the taxes we all pay as people and as businesses) went UP $30 billion a day versus last year. That’s a 10% improvement.

That means Americans and our businesses are trying hard to recover from the Obama recession.

For the same two months FEDERAL SPENDING went up $87 billion a day. That’s 16% spending MORE THAN LAST YEAR.

It’s really easy to see borrowing $6 TRILLION is not stimulating, it’s allowing spending to go so far out of line our entire economy can’t even keep the debt from growing..

So argue all you want about overspending helping the economy – the numbers simply tell a very different story.

Obama – $100 million here – $100 million there – and you have my inauguration – let’s spend more money

Stephen Dinan reports that “Because next year’s inauguration falls on a Sunday, President Obama will hold only a small, private swearing-in ceremony on Jan. 20, and will hold a big public redo the next day. The Inaugural Committee announced Thursday that activities will last three days: a day of service on Saturday, the small private ceremony on Sunday, and the public swearing-in, parade and balls on Monday.”

That means, the public “inauguration” is just a show, while the actual inauguration will again be behind closed doors (just as it was last go around).

What’s the show going to cost? If the cost of recent past inaugurations are any indication, well over $100 million.

In 2005, for President Bush’s second inauguration, “the federal government and the District of Columbia spent a combined $115.5 million, most of it for security, the swearing-in ceremony, cleanup and for a holiday for federal workers,” according to the New York Times.

And for Obama’s first inauguration in 2009, the cost for the government was over $125 million, according to reports:


Obama’s secret for success – do you know it?

It’s pretty simple. in fact our founding fathers discussed it, in writing, as the Constitution was written.

It’s all about the citizens who comprise the electorate.

Once those citizens realize they can get whatever they want from government as long as they comprise the majority of voters, they will do whatever they want.

Obama‘s entire strategy is to obtain the 51%.  He really does not care what he has to do, he just wants the power to radically change America to a socialist state. As long as he gives the 51% what they want he can go about the emasculation of America behind the scenes.

So the Obama secret is the 51% ers.

Obama approved a “fast and furious” weapons supply to Libyan rebels

Yep, Obama did it again. He secretly sent USA weapons to Libyan rebels. Almost immediately reports arrived that such weapons were going to alQaeda groups and other militant Islamists ( as he calls them). But on the shipments rolled.

NOW, there is some belief that some of those weapons we supplied were used to massacre our own people in Benghazi. Exactly like the weapoms sent to mexico by Obama were used to kill USA border guards.

Here is an article from the Obama, oops, New York Times:

Obamacare taxes itself to pay for itself – the logic of the government

Headline – IRS finalizes new tax for medical devices in healthcare law

Pardon me, but wasn’t Obamacare supposed to make medial care cheaper for everyone?

So, taxing the people who make the things that the medical profession uses to improve the health of people is making care cheaper? Creating a new tax also creates a cost someone has to pay. The tax creates no new value, it just makes whatever taxed more expensive.

Figure out that one.

Now add this – the government will tax everyone as a way to pay for Obamacare, BUT, the government will also subsidize that tax for maybe half the population. meaning Obamacare won’t bring in enough tax revenue to both pay for the medical care and subsidize those using it at the same time. Oh where is simple logic in Washington?

What a joke as a golfer, much less a president

Obama Goes Powergolfing with Bill Clinton

by Keith Koffler on December 2, 2012, 12:22 pm

President Obama today played golf at Andrews Air Force Base with Bill Clinton, U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk and Virginia gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe, according to the White House press office.

The outing seems to be part thank you to Clinton – who campaigned heavily for the president – and part strategy session for McAuliffe, who is personally close to Clinton.

This is the 107th time Obama has been golfing as president and the 15th time this year.

After avoiding the fairways during a reelection campaign that portrayed him as a warrior for the middle class, Obama has returned to golf with a vengeance, heading out to play three times since being reelected last month.


He’s gone golfing more than he’s attended national security meeting.