Skip to content

Obama Armed Rebels Secretly 3 Weeks Ago

March 30, 2011

President Barack Obama has signed a secret order authorizing covert U.S. government support for rebel forces seeking to oust
Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, government officials told Reuters on
Wednesday.

( THIS WAS REPORTEDLY DONE SEVERAL WEEKS AGO – WITH CONGRESS UNINFORMED AND NO OVERSIGHT – WE ARE ONLY NOW HEARING OF TERRORITS FACTIONS BEING PART OF THE REBEL FACTION)

Obama signed the order, known as a presidential “finding”, within the last
two or three weeks, according to four U.S. government sources familiar with the
matter.
Such findings are a principal form of presidential directive used to
authorize secret operations by the Central Intelligence Agency. The CIA and the
White House declined immediate comment.
News that Obama had given the authorization surfaced as the President and
other U.S. and allied officials spoke openly about the possibility of sending
arms supplies to Gaddafi’s opponents, who are fighting better-equipped
government forces.
The United States is part of a coalition, with NATO members and some Arab
states, which is conducting air strikes on Libyan government forces under a U.N.
mandate aimed at protecting civilians opposing Gaddafi.
In interviews with American TV networks on Tuesday, Obama said the objective
was for Gaddafi to “ultimately step down” from power. He spoke of applying
“steady pressure, not only militarily but also through these other means” to
force Gaddafi out.
Obama said the U.S. had not ruled out providing military hardware to rebels.
“It’s fair to say that if we wanted to get weapons into Libya, we probably
could. We’re looking at all our options at this point,” the President told ABC
News anchor Diane Sawyer.
U.S. officials monitoring events in Libya say that at present, neither
Gaddafi’s forces nor the rebels, who have asked the West for heavy weapons,
appear able to make decisive gains.
While U.S. and allied airstrikes have seriously damaged Gaddafi’s military
forces and disrupted his chain of command, officials say, rebel forces remain
disorganized and unable to take full advantage of western military support.
SPECIFIC OPERATIONS
People familiar with U.S. intelligence procedures said that Presidential
covert action “findings” are normally crafted to provide broad authorization for
a range of potential U.S. government actions to support a particular covert
objective.
In order for specific operations to be carried out under the provisions of
such a broad authorization — for example the delivery of cash or weapons to
anti-Gaddafi forces — the White House also would have to give additional
“permission” allowing such activities to proceed.
Former officials say these follow-up authorizations are known in the
intelligence world as “‘Mother may I’ findings.”
In 2009 Obama gave a similar authorization for the expansion of covert U.S.
counter-terrorism actions by the CIA in Yemen. The White House does not normally
confirm such orders have been issued.
Because U.S. and allied intelligence agencies still have many questions about
the identities and leadership of anti-Gaddafi forces, any covert U.S. activities
are likely to proceed cautiously until more information about the rebels can be
collected and analyzed, officials said.
“The whole issue on (providing rebels with) training and equipment requires
knowing who the rebels are,” said Bruce Riedel, a former senior CIA Middle East
expert who has advised the Obama White House.
Riedel said that helping the rebels to organize themselves and training them
how use weapons effectively would be more urgent then shipping them arms.
According to an article speculating on possible U.S. covert actions in Libya
published early in March on the website of the Voice of America, the U.S.
government’s broadcasting service, a covert action is “any U.S. government
effort to change the economic, military, or political situation overseas in a
hidden way.”
ARMS SUPPLIES
The article, by VOA intelligence correspondent Gary Thomas, said covert
action “can encompass many things, including propaganda, covert funding,
electoral manipulation, arming and training insurgents, and even encouraging a
coup.”
U.S. officials also have said that Saudi Arabia and Qatar, whose leaders
despise Gaddafi, have indicated a willingness to supply Libyan rebels with
weapons.
Members of Congress have expressed anxiety about U.S. government activities
in Libya. Some have recalled that weapons provided by the U.S. and Saudis to
mujahedeen fighting Soviet occupation forces in Afghanistan in the 1980s later
ended up in the hands of anti-American militants.
There are fears that the same thing could happen in Libya unless the U.S. is
sure who it is dealing with. The chairman of the House intelligence committee,
Rep. Mike Rogers, said on Wednesday he opposed supplying arms to the Libyan
rebels fighting Gaddafi “at this time.”
“We need to understand more about the opposition before I would support
passing out guns and advanced weapons to them,” Rogers said in a statement.

By Mark
Hosenball
Reuters

Advertisements
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: